Please cite this paper as:

Majumder, R., Datta, M., Sarkar, S., Chattopadhyay, A. and Bandyopadhyay, D. 2022. The bacteriostatic property of melatonin targets peptic ulcer disease and cholangiocarcinoma. Melatonin Research. 5, 1 (Mar. 2022), 1-17. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32794/mr112500116.


Review

The bacteriostatic property of melatonin targets peptic ulcer disease and cholangiocarcinoma                                                                                                                    

Romit Majumderab, Madhuri Dattaab, Swaimanti Sarkara, Aindrila Chattopadhyayb*, Debasish Bandyopadhyaya* 

aOxidative Stress and Free Radical Biology Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Calcutta, 92, APC Road, Kolkata-700009, India

bDepartment of Physiology, Vidyasagar College, 39, Sankar Ghosh Lane, Kolkata-700006, India

*Correspondence: debasish63@gmail.com, Tel:  +91-9433072066; aindrila63@gmail.com, Tel: +91-9836060830

Running title: Melatonin, peptic ulcer disease and cholangiocarcinoma 

Received: November 18, 2021; Accepted: February 12, 2022


ABSTRACT

The marked drop in the frequency of Helicobacter pylori infection resulting from the use of antibiotics and potent anti-acid medications has substantially lowered the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in recent decades. Management of this condition, however, is challenging because of the escalating perils of antibiotic resistance and the abuse of anti-inflammatory drugs. For example, the increased prevalence of cholangiocarcinomas may associate with this peptic ulcer disease management including the prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors. Cholangiocarcinoma is one of the most lethal cancers and accounts for almost 15% of all hepatic malignancies. This review provides a concise summary of the latest findings in the pathogenetic mechanisms of cholangiocarcinoma, essentially focusing on peptic ulcer disease and its associated therapies. We also suggest interventions that may reduce Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcers with the bacteriostatic agent, melatonin. Melatonin treatment may reduce the incidence of this devastating cancer or improve the outcome of individuals that develop this disease. 

Key words: peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori, proton pump inhibitor, cholangiocarcinoma, melatonin.


1. INTRODUCTION

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) encompasses both gastric and duodenal ulcers and is a massive threat to the health of global population due to its high morbidity (1). For years, surgical removal of gastric tissue has been a common treatment of PUD, but, often resulting in complications and high mortality rates. With the discovery of histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) such as ranitidine and cimetidine in the early 70s, suppression of gastric acid secretion became a conventional treatment for PUD. This treatment remarkably reduced the number of elective peptic ulcer surgeries (2).With the expansion of the use of the proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), further improvement on both gastric and duodenal ulcer treatment was achieved (3).

A great deal has changed since the identification of H. pylori in the human gut. With the help of targeted antibiotics, new generations of H2RAs, and PPIs, great improvements in ulcer treatment have been achieved and this novel therapy significantly reduces the morbidity of patients. Despite a sharp decline in the total cases worldwide, one percent of  Americans is still a victim of the dreaded PUD (4). Unfortunately, the use of H2RAs and PPIs is also accompanied by several side effects. These side effects are secondary to the acid-suppressive action of PPIs, which result in fundic gland polyps, hypergastrinemia, and enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia, thereby leading to carcinogenesis (5). Similarly, prolonged use of antibiotics is associated with increased drug resistance and may even exacerbate the existing ulcers (6). The acid-suppressive action of PPIs and bacterial resistance to antibiotics provide the optimal situation for another lethal condition, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (6, 7).

     CCA is a group of heterogeneous malignant tumors that occur throughout the hepato-biliary tree. Currently, CCA accounts for ~15% of all hepatic malignancies and ~3% of gastrointestinal carcinomas and the incidence of CCA is constantly increasing globally (6). The difficulty to detect CCA combined with aggressive nature and resistance to chemotherapy render to the high mortality of CCA which account for ~2% of all cancer-related annual deaths globally. With an overall survival rate of 7-20%, the diagnosis, therapy, and awareness of CCA have not significantly improved recently (7).

Considering the potential role of peptic ulcer medications on the incidence of CCA, characterization of each of these drugs and their respective roles in the onset of CCA have become essential to understand the potential mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis. Herein, we summarize the current understanding of the role of conventional peptic ulcer medications on CCA, with emphasis on epigenetic aspects and molecular pathways. Also, we hypothesize that melatonin as a bacteriostatic agent will reduce the incidence of PUD, minimize the intermittent risk factors, and also substantially reduce the onset of CCA.

 

2. PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE

The term peptic ulcer is indicative of an injury to the digestive tract, resulting in mucosal breakage, stretching down to the level of the submucosa (8). Initially, a hyper-acidic environment combined with dietary and stress-mediated factors were considered to be the primary causes of most PUD. With the discovery of the involvement of H. pylori and unrestricted use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the latter half of the 20th century, this idea has been changed substantially (9).

2.1. Pathogenesis.

     The breach in the gastric mucosal barrier due to elevated gastric acids followed by a noxious inflammatory reaction causes PUD. A variety of exogenous and endogenous stimuli promote ulcer formation by enhancing gastric acid production or diluting the mucosal bicarbonate layer. H. pylori and the overuse of NSAIDs are considered as two major risk factors of PUD (9).

Host reaction and the mucosal inflammatory response to H. pylori determine the outcome of the infection. The proteins including BabA and OpiA synthesized by H. pylori facilitate the attachment of bacteria to the gastric epithelium, thus, contributing to the virulence and the host immune response from H. pylori. In addition, these organisms also release urease, creating an alkaline milieu that enables the bacterium to successfully evade the highly acidic environment in the stomach (10, 11).

As to NSAID, the risk of PUD-associated complications is four times high in NSAID users compared to non-users (12). Thus, NSAIDs are ranked as the second most important causative factor responsible for the onset and progression of the disease. Initially, it was thought that topical injury and reduction of mucus bicarbonate caused by NSAID were the main mechanisms related to gastric damage (13). Subsequently, it was identified that the damages were induced by the suppressed gastric prostaglandin synthesis by NSAID (14).

2.2. Epidemiology.

Epidemiologically, the lifetime prevalence of PUD in the global population is approximately 5−10% with an incidence of about 0·1–0·3% per year (15). Central America, South America, Europe, and Asia, have seen a rapid decline in mortality from gastric and duodenal ulcers irrespective of the differences in healthcare systems and socioeconomic statuses (16). This drop is associated with a reduction in H. pylori-associated PUD.

Although the increased use of NSAIDs does not seem to justify the recent trends in ulcer-related mortality, numerous studies have reported decreasing hospital admissions for complications of PUD in the 21st century. With an incidence of 79 cases per 100,000 people per year and annually less than 30 cases of PUD complications (16–18), these figures possibly indicate the success of the current therapeutics on this disease (18). However, there have been several instances where severe complications have surfaced due to the prolonged use of such PUD-targeted medications.

2.3. Management and therapeutics.

Research on the pathogenesis and treatment of PUD has made remarkable progress, which will hopefully help to revolutionize the medical approach to ulcer management. Since Schwarz’s percept of “no acid, no ulcer”, the quest for a suitable management strategy for PUD has been directed at this goal, i.e., to reduce gastric acid secretion and enhance the mucosal defense (19). Currently, the objectives of anti-ulcer therapies are more precise and target-oriented. These include pain reduction, ulcerative wound healing, averting complications, and preventing a possible relapse. Thus, limiting ulcer recurrence is of utmost importance for achieving the long-term goal of reducing global morbidity and mortality (20). The current management protocols for PUD, along with the doses and side effects of different drugs used, are summarized in Table 1. 

2.3.1. H. pylori-associated ulcers.

 A variety of studies have suggested that the eradication of H. pylori infection itself is sufficient to heal gastroduodenal ulcers and is also sufficient to prevent relapse and intermittent bleeding in the absence of remedial acid-suppressive therapy (20). However, this successful treatment of H. pylori infection currently faces a global challenge because of the increased resistance of bacteria to antibiotics. Currently, the first-line regime consists of a PPI and two antibiotics (clarithromycin and amoxicillin), for consecutive 7−14 day use (23–26). In many developed countries, due to increasing cases of antibiotic resistance, the effectiveness of this combined regimen for H. pylori infection fell from 90% to less than 70% (25, 26). Thus, any treatment should take into consideration the outcomes tested for antimicrobial susceptibility (25). Unfortunately, such tests are not commonly available in countries with low socioeconomic status and rapidly expanding populations. Accordingly, the first-line therapies should be individualized, keeping in mind the local prevalence of antibiotic resistance if it can possibly be determined. For instance, when the bacterial susceptibility test is not available, PPI-based triple therapy regimens have been modified to not include clarithromycin in areas with a local clarithromycin resistance rate higher than 15% (26, 27). As a result, this leads to an increased dependence on PPIs and H+ channel blockers to combat ulceration. Seemingly, using higher doses of PPI (twice the conventional dosage) and changing the duration of the therapy from 7 days to a maximum of 14 days may aid in the eradication of H. pylori (9). 

2.3.2. NSAID-associated ulcers.

The overuse of NSAIDs is the most significant cause of PUD in nations with a declining prevalence of H. pylori infections. In such situations, if patients discontinue the use of NSAID, the ulcer healing would be improved. However, for certain patients who are required to continuously use NSAIDs because of some underlying infirmity, this would delay the overall healing process of the ulcer. There are some strategies available for restricting the onset of gastroduodenal ulcers and arresting their progression, thus, enabling patients to use NSAIDs. These include the combined use of NSAIDs with PPIs, H+ receptor antagonists, or misoprostol (28). Substitution of non-selective NSAIDs with COX-2-selective NSAIDs is another strategy. For example, a combination of a COX-2-selective NSAID with a gastroprotective agent can prove to be a viable option to address this issue (29,30). 

The increasing prevalence of H. pylori-resistance with the recurrence of idiopathic ulcers is frequently associated with bleeding complications and death (31). Although long-term PPI treatment is regularly recommended, whether this strategy improves clinical outcomes of PUD is yet to be confirmed.


3. THE POTENTIAL ASSOCIATION OF PUD AND LONG TERM PPI USE ON THE HEPATOBILIARY MALIGNANCIES

Hepatobiliary cancer continues to be one of the cancers with high mortality rates (28). PUD caused by  H. pylori infection has emerged as the leading cause of such malignancies by stimulating inflammation and consequential neoplastic progression (32). The eradication of H. pylori can substantially diminish the incidence of such carcinomas. In contrast, the unrestricted use of pain medications and growing resistance of H. pylori to conventional antibiotics may promote PUD and its associated malignancies.

PPIs are a class of medications, which are indispensable for the treatment of PUDs and have been widely used in both developed and developing countries (33). However, their intense gastric-acid suppressive activity has raised concerns about their association with carcinogenesis (34). These concerns are due to the fact that PPIs can induce hypergastrinemia and bacterial overgrowth in the gut (35). One of the most prevalent carcinomas triggered by PUD and its related therapeutics is CCA.


                                                 Table 1: A tabulation of the drugs available for PUD treatment.

 

Function

Classification

Name   of Drug

Recommended   Doses

          Side Effects

Gastric   acid suppression

Proton   pump inhibitors

Omeprazole

20mg/day;   40mg/day for faster healing

Nausea,   dizziness, headache, diarrhea, abdominal pain, muscle, and joint pain,   leucopenia, hepatic dysfunction, atrophic gastritis (20)

Esomeprazole

20-40mg/day

Lansoprazole

15-30mg/day   for ulcer healing

Pantoprazole

40-120mg/day

Rabeprazole

40-80mg/day

Dexrabeprazole

10-20mg/day

H2   antihistamines

Ranitidine

300mg/day   ulcer healing; 150mg for maintenance

Headache,   diarrhea/constipation, dizziness,

bowel   upset, rare disorientation, rash,

transient   elevation in plasma aminotransferases; high doses for long periods can lead   to loss of libido, gynecomastia, impotency, decreased sperm count (20)

Famotidine

40mg/day   for ulcer healing; 20mg for maintenance

Roxatidine

150mg/day   for ulcer healing; 75mg for maintenance

Cimetidine

800mg   for ulcer healing; 400mg for maintenance ;

Anticholinergics

Oxyphenonium

5-10mg/day

Dry   mouth, constipation, urinary retention (21)

Propantheline

15mg/day

Pirenzepine

100-150mg/day

Prostaglandin   analog

Misoprostol

800µg/day

Diarrhea,   abdominal cramps, uterine bleeding, abortion (20)

Anti-H. pylori drugs

N/A

Clarithromycin

1g/day

Diarrhoea,   nausea, taste distortion, stomatitis, bloating (22)

Amoxicillin

2g/day

Tinidazole

1g/day

Tetracycline

1-2g/day

Metronidazole

1-2g/day

Antacids

Systemic

Sodium   citrate

1g   neutralizes 10mEq HCl

Alkalosis,   some of them may produce CO2 in the stomach causing distention,   discomfort, acid rebound, may worsen edema and CH, increases Naload   (20)

Sodium   bicarbonate

1g   neutralizes 12mEq HCl

Non-systemic

Magnesium   hydroxide

1g   neutralizes 30mEq HCl

Aluminium   hydroxide gel

1g   neutralizes 1-2.5mEq HCl

Magnesium   trisilicate

1g   neutralizes 1mEq HCl

Magaldrate

1g   neutralizes 28mEq HCl

Calcium   carbonate

1g   neutralizes 20mEq HCl

Ulcer   protective

N/A

Sucralfate

4g/day

Constipation,   hypophosphatemia, dry mouth, nausea, diarrhea, headache, dizziness (20)

Colloidal   bismuth sulphate

480mg/day

 

4. CCA

      CCA is a group of heterogeneous epithelial tumors that form within the biliary tree. As per prevalence, CCA holds the second position among primary hepatic malignancies, accounting for approximately 15–20% of the newly diagnosed cases (28). Based on their location, there are three subtypes of CCA (Table 2): intra-hepatic CCA (iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), and distal CCA (dCCA) (36). Surgical intervention has always been the first choice for CCA, irrespective of its subtype. However, only a small portion of the patients who are in the early stage of the disease are considered eligible for surgery, with iCCA having the highest (63%) and dCCA having the lowest (23%) 5-year survival rate (37).

In majority of the cases, CCA is generated by malignant transformation of cholangiocytes, but there are some instances where transformed epithelial cells within peribiliary glands or biliary stem cells also trigger the onset of CCAs. Multiple studies suggest that subsets of CCA and mixed hepatocellular carcinoma/CCA also originate from hepatic stem/progenitor cells (38).

 

                                                                           Table 2: Classification of CCA

 

Type

Occurrence

Subtype

Symptoms

Intrahepatic CCA

Intrahepatic biliary tract (39)

Mass-forming (40)

Cachexia, abdominal pain, night sweats, fatigue (40)

Periductal-infiltrating (40)

Intraductal (41)

Undefined (41)

Perihilar CCA

Between second-order biliary ducts up to the site of   cystic duct origin (39)

Periductal (39)

Painless jaundice, cholangitis, malaise, abdominal   discomfort, nausea, anorexia (41, 42)

Intraductal (39)

Distal CCA

Between cystic duct and ampulla of Vater (39)

Well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (39)

Painless jaundice (39)


4.1. Risk factors.

Numerous risk factors contribute to the onset of CCA. These include parasitic infections, primary sclerosing cholangitis, biliary-duct cysts, hepatolithiasis, and toxins (43). A clear association between PUDs and CCAs has been observed (44), especially, when this PUD is caused by H. Pylori infection (45). Thus it is hypothesized that H. pylori may play a key role in carcinogenesis by increasing the kinetics of the biliary epithelial division (46). However, the mechanisms driving the generation of CCA induced by PUD are complex and not well defined.

4.2. Pathogenesis.

CCA typically develops on a background of inflammation (44). There are a plethora of processes known to cause inflammation in the gut and the hepatobiliary tree. The focus of this article is solely given to the role of PUD. Here, two scenarios on the chronic development of peptic ulcers that will trigger and accelerate the onset of CCA are proposed. A detailed overview of these has been illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1-1.png

Fig. 1: The potential mechanisms associated with the genesis of CCA caused by H. pylori infection and prolonged PPI administration.

     H. pylori exhibits its oncogenic properties via the CagA (Cytotoxin-associated gene A) pathogenicity island, in which CagA is phosphorylated through Abl and SFK (Src family kinase). Phosphorylated CagA activates SHP2 (Src homology region 2 (SH2) - containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2) which further activates ERK 1/2 (Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) to promote the downstream transcription of c fos and c jun. Also, YAP (Transportation analysis zone) and TAZ (Transportation analysis zone) dimerize and get activated in the presence of SHP2. This multimeric complex fuses with TEAD (TEA domain transcription factor) and translocated inside the nucleus and ultimately activates downstream transcription of CTGF (Connective tissue growth factor) and CYR61 (Cysteine-rich angiogenic protein 61). Prolonged use of PPI at the same time induces hypergastrinemia which promotes the formation of multiple heterogeneous epithelial tumors. This results in uncontrolled cell growth and loss of contact inhibition in the hepatobiliary epithelial cells. 

4.2.1. Role of H. pylori.

 The  H. pylori colonies located in antral portions of the stomach which can stimulate gastric secretion are the hallmark of PUD-associated CCA (47). The presence of H. pylori colonies in the hepatobiliary tree, especially in patients with severe infections has also been reported (48). With the successful characterization of different Helicobacter strains in the biliary system, their roles in triggering malignant biliary diseases have been defined (48). Based on the current findings, the inflammation followed by epithelial cell proliferation and interference with the cell cycle via modifications in signal transduction seems to be the most plausible explanation of carcinogenesis. However, there have been speculations that the H. pylori virulence factor CagA (Cytotoxin-associated gene A)  may mediate carcinogenesis in the hepatobiliary tree (6). It seems that CagA, an oncoprotein, interferes with signal transduction pathways (49–53) and the host's response to H. pylori antigens via the formation of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators (54–56).

4.2.2. Role of PPIs.

PPIs are the first choice for treating PUD, because of their safety and efficacy (33, 57). Since their initial use in the 1980s, PPIs have become the most widely prescribed medications (58). The long-term use of PPIs has also become a crucial issue concerning their toxicity (59). Their potent acid-suppressive effect has long been suspected as a risk factor for neoplasia, along with other serious disorders related to nutrition, bone metabolism, and infections (59, 60). Gastrin peptides, along with their dedicated receptors, potentiate the progression of gastrointestinal malignancies in the presence of inflammation (44). Hypergastrinemia is considered to be the major mechanism associated with PPI-induced carcinogenesis. It causes a persistent elevation in gastric antral pH and spurs cell proliferation leading to carcinogenesis and tumor growth (35). Recent studies have demonstrated that PPI use is associated with peri-ampullary tumors (61). Peng et al. have reported that the odds of onset of CCA are positively related to PPI use (7). Hence, it is reasonable to consider that PPI use and CCA are intercorrelated (7,62,63). 


5. POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF MELATONIN ON PUD AND ITS ASSOCIATED CCA

Based on the literature, the number of studies to search for new treatments on PUD has continuously increased throughout the years. However, interventions that simultaneously deal with both PUD and CCA are scarce. The majority of the current research focus on minor modifications to the conventional triple therapy regime and few attempts are made to develop alternative interventions (64). Here, we propose a potentially important therapy for PUD/CCA with melatonin. Melatonin is a well-known sleep modulator with actions on circadian rhythms (65). In addition, melatonin also plays an active role in numerous other biological activities including its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions (66, 67). It also has profound effects on the gastrointestinal tract. It promotes gastric motility, nutrient absorption, and food digestion. The melatonin is synthesized and secreted from the gastrointestinal mucosa which, provides onsite protection against noxious internal and external insults and maintains gastrointestinal integrity. For example, under the condition of PUD, melatonin promotes the activity of antioxidant enzymes, gastric blood flow, and mucous secretion while reducing acid secretion, and interferes with the prostaglandin-dependent pathways to accelerate ulcer healing and prevent its recurrence (68–71). Another mechanism suggests that melatonin can suppress the activities of metalloproteinases 3 and 9, which cause serious implications on PUD and CCA. These activities are probably mediated by melatonin receptors since luzindole (melatonin receptor antagonist) significantly attenuates the ulcer healing effects of melatonin (72, 73). The accumulated evidence shows that melatonin can reduce the incidence of PUD (71) as well as CCA (74, 75). 

5.1. Bacteriostatic effects of melatonin.

Sufficient evidence has proved the cause-and-effect association between H. pylori infection and gastric ulcers. Controlling the infection will reduce the onset of PUD. As a result, antibiotics including clarithromycin and amoxicillin serve as the first choice for treating H. pylori-induced infections in the gut (64). However, frequent use of these drugs has caused a surge in antibiotic resistance (76). 

On the other hand, melatonin supplementation exhibits a profound protective effect on H. pylori-induced chronic gastric ulcers, dyspepsia, and accelerates their healing processes (69, 77). This effect may relate to a potential bacteriostatic activity of melatonin on H. pylori. Tekbas and colleagues (78) have tested the role of melatonin against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The results showed a higher inhibitory potential of melatonin on gram-negative bacteria than that in gram-positive ones (78). The reason may be related to the protein glycopeptide and lipopolysaccharide-rich cell envelope of the gram-negative bacteria. Melatonin limits the uptake of linoleic acid and total fatty acids, which serve as an essential component for the formation of the cell envelope in gram-negative bacteria (79, 80). Hence, H. pylori, being gram-negative, can be inhibited by melatonin. Konar et al. reported that melatonin, at the concentration of 1000 µg/ml, significantly reduced the lipid level of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. While at 300 µg/ml, it significantly reduced lipid levels of Candida albicans (81). All these pieces of evidence suggest the potential action of melatonin in controlling H. pylori infection.

Additionally, melatonin has a high metal binding capacity (82). This enables melatonin to bind to Fe2+ with great potency. Hence, it considerably inhibits bacterial division as Fe2+ is essential for the replication of the bacteria. This prolongs the lag phase of bacterial replication and, in some cases, might even substantially restrict bacterial growth  (78). 

5.2. Altered melatonergic system and its components in CCA: AANAT (aralkylamine N-acetyltransferase), melatonin, and its receptors.

Melatonin levels in bile are 2 to 3 times higher than that in day-time serum levels (83). The immense high level of melatonin in bile is essential for preventing the biliary and intestinal epithelium damages elicited by bile acids and oxidized cholesterol derivatives, as well as inhibiting PUD and its associated malignancy (83). It has been reported that melatonin prevents biliary hyperplasia and provides a chemopreventive effect in CCA treatment by attenuating oxidative damage (74). H. pylori infection-induced PUD is associated with lowered melatonin levels and decreased expression of AANAT in the gastric mucosa (77, 84). Dysregulation of AANAT/melatonin and melatonin receptor axis is observed in CCA and decreased secretion of melatonin enhances CCA growth (74). Han et al. hypothesized that higher levels of melatonin are associated with reduced chances for the development of CCA (74). This can be achieved by upregulation of the expression of AANAT (one of the key regulatory enzymes of melatonin biosynthesis). Melatonin may retard tumor growth due to the presence of melatonin receptors on these tumors. Han and his colleagues identified an autocrine loop between AANAT and MT receptors. Treatment with melatonin increased the sensitivity of the MT receptors, which in turn resulted in the upregulation of AANAT expression (74, 85) and an accumulation of melatonin in the hepatobiliary tree. Melatonin in elevated levels inhibits the carcinogenic growth of the bile duct epithelium via the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway as shown for other cancers (86). The high levels of melatonin may also contribute to its bacteriostatic abilities.

 

6. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSION

This review provides insights into the potential association between melatonin and PUD. Additionally, this review also focuses on the likelihood of PUD-induced CCA. CCA, in general, has a high mortality rate often due to its delayed detection. Based on the mechanisms mentioned above, melatonin is recommended to be used to combat PUD/CCA in addition to its low cost and safety. Melatonin, also shares structural similarities with omeprazole, thus making it a more suitable candidate replacing conventional PPIs in treating PUDs. Because of the severe side effects, several hospitals in the United States have already issued an order to stop the use of all PPIs (87) thus, compelling clinicians to conduct more studies on melatonin against PUD and CCA. The reduced use of PPIs may lead to fewer cases of CCA.

Here, we address that the bacteriostatic effect of melatonin may be the major mechanism of melatonin to reduce PUD and its associated CCA. The melatonergic system including AANAT, melatonin receptors, and high-level melatonin levels in the gut and hepatobiliary tissues facilitates an endogenous autocrine loop of melatonin’s action. Further experiments are necessary to identify the value of melatonin as a possible treatment for these serious gastrointestinal problems.  Considering the limitations of current therapies, a new effective treatment paradigm including melatonin is likely to be widely accepted and is certainly needed.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

RM and MD are supported by the departmental BI grant of the University of Calcutta available to Prof. DB. Dr. AC is supported by funds available to her from the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of West Bengal. Dr. DB also gratefully acknowledges the support he received from the DST-PURSE Program awarded to the University of Calcutta.

 

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION

Dr. AC and Dr. DB contributed to the conception, critically corrected and approved the manuscript. RM prepared, drafted, and edited the manuscript, tables, and figures. MD contributed to preparing the tables and editing the manuscript. SS helped in editing the manuscript. We are deeply indebted to Dr. DunXian Tan for his critical reading and meticulous editing of the manuscript.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

ABBREVIATIONS


AANAT:         Arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase

BabA:              Blood group antigen binding adhesin

CagA:              Cytotoxin-associated gene A

CCA:               Cholangiocarcinoma

COX-2:           Cyclooxygenase-2

dCCA:             Distal cholangiocarcinoma

H. pylori:        Helicobacter pylori

H2RA:             Histamine H2 - receptor

iCCA:              Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma

NSAID:           Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug

OpiA:              Outside pathogenicity island A

pCCA:             Perihilarcholangiocarcinoma

PPI:                 Proton pump inhibitor

PUD:               Peptic ulcer disease

SFK:                Src family kinase

SHP2:              Src homology region 2 (SH2) - containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2

TAZ:               Transportation analysis zone

YAP:               Yes-associated protein

ERK:               Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase

TEAD:            TEA domain transcription factor

CTGF:             Connective tissue growth factor

CYR61:           Cysteine-rich angiogenic protein 61


REFERENCES

 

  1. Malfertheiner P, Chan FK, McColl K EL (2009) Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet 374 (9699): 1449–1461. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60938-7.

  2. Gustavsson S, Nyren O (1989) Time trends in peptic ulcer surgery, 1956 to 1986. A nation-wide survey in Sweden. Ann. Surg. 210 (6): 704–709. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198912000-00003.

  3. Sachs G (1997) Proton pump inhibitors and acid-related diseases. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 17 (1): 22–37. DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1997.tb03675.x.

  4. Sonnenberg A, Everhart JE (1996) The prevalence of self-reported peptic ulcer in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 86 (2): 200–205. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.86.2.200.

  5. Malfertheiner P, Kandulski A, Venerito M (2017) Proton-pump inhibitors: understanding the complications and risks. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14 (12): 697–710. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.117.

  6. Segura-López FK, Güitrón-Cantú A, Torres J (2015) Association between Helicobacter spp. infections and hepatobiliary malignancies: A review. World J. Gastroenterol. 21 (5): 1414–1423. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1414.

  7. Peng YC, Lin CL, Hsu WY, Chow WK, Lee SW, Yeh HZ, Chen CC, Kao CH (2018) Association between cholangiocarcinoma and proton pump inhibitors use: A nested case-control study. Front. Pharmacol. (JUL). DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00718.

  8.  Lanas A, Chan FKL (2017) Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet 390 (10094): 613–624. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32404-7.

  9. Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, Henderson C, Howden CW, Metz DC (2011) Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion 84 (2):102-13. DOI: 10.1159/000323958.

  10. Datta DD and Roychowdhury S (2015) To be or not to be: The host genetic factor and beyond in Helicobacter pylori mediated gastro-duodenal diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 21 (10): 2883–2895. DOI: 10.3748/WJG.V21.I10.2883.

  11. Shiotani A, Y Graham D (2002) Pathogenesis and therapy of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease. Med. Clin. North Am. 86 (6): 1447–1466. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-7125(02)00083-4.

  12. Huang JQ, Sridhar S, Hunt RH (2002) Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: A meta-analysis. Lancet 359 (9300): 14–22. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07273-2.

  13. Lichtenberger LM, Wang ZM, Romero JJ, Ulloa C, Perez JC, Giraud MN, Barreto JC (1995) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) associate with zwitterionic phospholipids: insight into the mechanism and reversal of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal injury. Nat. Med. (2): 154–158. DOI: 10.1038/NM0295-154.

  14. Wallace JL (2008) Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn’t the stomach digest itself? Physiol. Rev. 88 (4): 1547–1565. DOI: 10.1152/PHYSREV.00004.2008.

  15. Rosenstock SJ, Jørgensen T (1995) Prevalence and incidence of peptic ulcer disease in a Danish County--a prospective cohort study. Gut 36 (6): 819–824. DOI: 10.1136/GUT.36.6.819.

  16. Kurata JH, Nogawa AN, Abbey DE, Petersen F (1992) A prospective study of risk for peptic ulcer disease in Seventh-Day Adventists. Gastroenterology 102 (3): 902–909. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90176-Y.

  17. Lanas A, García-Rodríguez LA, Polo-Tomás M, Ponce M, Quintero E, Perez-Aisa MA, Gisbert JP, Bujanda L, Castro M, Muñoz M, Del-Pino MD, Garcia S, Calvet X (2011) The changing face of hospitalisation due to gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 33 (5): 585–591. DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2036.2010.04563.X.

  18. Malmi H, Kautiainen H, Virta LJ, Färkkilä N, Koskenpato J, Färkkilä MA (2014) Incidence and complications of peptic ulcer disease requiring hospitalisation have markedly decreased in Finland. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 39 (5): 496–506. DOI: 10.1111/APT.12620.

  19. Schwarz K (1910) Ueberpenetrierendemagen-und jejunalgeschwure. Beitr. Klin. Chir. 67 : 96–128.

  20. Tripathi KD (2004) Essentials of medical pharmacology. Jaypee Brothers, Medical Publishers; 2004. 184–185 p. DOI: 10.5005/jp/books/12256.

  21. Henry DA, Langman MJS (1981) Adverse effects of anti-ulcer drugs. Drugs 21 (6): 444–459. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198121060-00004.

  22. Nista EC, Candelli M, Cremonini F, Cazzato IA, Zocco MA, Franceschi F, Cammarota G, Gasbarrini G, Gasbarrini A (2004) Bacillus clausii therapy to reduce side-effects of anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment: randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Aliment. Pharmacol. \&Ther. 20 (10): 1181–1188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02274.x.

  23. Tanikawa C, Urabe Y, Matsuo K, Kubo M, Takahashi A, Ito H, Tajima K, Kamatani N, Nakamura Y, Matsuda K (2012) A genome-wide association study identifies two susceptibility loci for duodenal ulcer in the Japanese population. Nat. Genet. 44 (4): 430–434. DOI: 10.1038/NG.1109.

  24. Fock KM, Katelaris P, Sugano K, Ang TL, Hunt R, Talley NJ, Lam SK, Xiao SD, Tan HJ, Wu CY, Jung HC, Hoang BH, Kachintorn U, Goh KL, Chiba T, Rani AA (2009) Second asia-pacific consensus guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 24 (10): 1587–1600. DOI: 10.1111/J.1440-1746.2009.05982.X.

  25. Fallone CA, Chiba N, van Zanten SV, Fischbach L, Gisbert JP, Hunt RH, Jones NL, Render C, Leontiadis GI, Moayyedi P, Marshall JK (2016) The Toronto consensus for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. Gastroenterology 151 (1): 51-69. e14. DOI: 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2016.04.006.

  26. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon A et al. (2017) Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut 66 (1): 6–30. DOI: 10.1136/GUTJNL-2016-312288.

  27. Graham DY, laine l (2016) The Toronto Helicobacter pylori consensus in context. Gastroenterology 151 (1): 9. DOI: 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2016.05.009.

  28. Leontiadis GI, Sreedharan A, Dorward S, Barton P, Delaney B, Howden CW, Orhewere M, Gisbert J, Sharma VK, Rostom A, Moayyedi P, Forman D (2007) Systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Health Technol. Assess. 11 (51). DOI: 10.3310/HTA11510.

  29. Wallace JL (1997) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastroenteropathy: The second hundred years. Gastroenterology 112 (3): 1000–1016. DOI: 10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9041264.

  30. Perini R, Ma L, Wallace J (2003) Mucosal repair and COX-2 inhibition. Curr. Pharm. Des. (27): 2207–2211. DOI: 10.2174/1381612033454027.

  31. Hung LCT, Ching JYL, Sung JJY, To KF, Hui AJ, Wong VWS, Leong RWL, Chan HLY, Wu JCY, Leung WK, Lee YT, Chung SCS, Chan FKL (2005) Long-term outcome of helicobacter pylori-negative idiopathic bleeding ulcers: a prospective cohort study. Gastroenterology 128 (7): 1845–1850. DOI: 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2005.03.026.

  32. Neil GA, Suchower LJ, Johnson E, Ronca PD, Skoglund ML (1998) Helicobacter pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction of duodenal ulcer recurrence. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 12 (7): 619–633. DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2036.1998.00351.X.

  33. Fock KM, Talley N, Goh KL, Sugano K, Katelaris P, Holtmann G et al. (2016) Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an update focusing on refractory reflux disease and Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 65 (9): 1402–1415. DOI: 10.1136/GUTJNL-2016-311715.

  34. Tran-Duy A, Spaetgens B, Hoes AW, de Wit NJ, Stehouwer CDA (2016) Use of proton pump inhibitors and risks of fundic gland polyps and gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14 (12): 1706-1719.e5. DOI: 10.1016/J.CGH.2016.05.018.

  35. Orlando LA, Lenard L, Orlando RC (2007) Chronic hypergastrinemia: causes and consequences. Dig. Dis. Sci. 52 (10): 2482–2489. DOI: 10.1007/S10620-006-9419-3.

  36. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE (2009) Burden of digestive diseases in the United States Part III: Liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Gastroenterology 136 (4): 1134–1144. DOI: 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2009.02.038.

  37. 37.  DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Kamangar F, Winter JM, Lillemoe KD, Choti MA, Yeo CJ, Schulick RD (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann. Surg. 245 (5): 755–762. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000251366.62632.D3.

  38. Fava G (2010) Molecular mechanisms of cholangiocarcinoma. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. (1): 12. DOI: 10.4291/WJGP.V1.I1.12.

  39. Razumilava N, Gores GJ (2013) Classification, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11 (1): 13-21.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.09.009.

  40. Blechacz B, Komuta M, Roskams T, Gores GJ (2003) Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg10 (4): 288–291. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.131.

  41. Nagorney DM, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Schleck CD, Ilstrup DM (1993) Outcomes after curative resections of cholangiocarcinoma. Arch. Surg. 128 (8): 871–878. DOI: 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1993.01420200045008.

  42. Blechacz B, Gores GJ (2008) Cholangiocarcinoma: Advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology 48 (1): 308. DOI: 10.1002/hep.22310.

  43. Cheung KS, Chan EW, Wong AYS, Chen L, Wong ICK, Leung WK (2018) Long-term proton pump inhibitors and risk of gastric cancer development after treatment for Helicobacter pylori: a population-based study. Gut 67 (1): 28–35. DOI: 10.1136/GUTJNL-2017-314605.

  44. Aly A, Shulkes A, Baldwin GS (2004) Gastrins, cholecystokinins and gastrointestinal cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1704 (1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/J.BBCAN.2004.01.004.

  45. Welzel TM, Graubard BI, El-Serag HB, Shaib YH, Hsing AW, Davila JA, McGlynn KA (2007) Risk factors for intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population based case-control study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (10): 1221. DOI: 10.1016/J.CGH.2007.05.020.

  46. Kuroki T, Fukuda K, Yamanouchi K, Kitajima T, Matsuzaki S, Tajima Y, Furui J, Kanematsu T (2002) Helicobacter pylori accelerates the biliary epithelial cell proliferation activity in hepatolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 49 (45): 648–651. PMID: 12063961.

  47. Narayanan M, Reddy KM, Marsicano E (2018) Peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori infection. Mo. Med. 115 (3): 219. PMID: 30228726.

  48. Boonyanugomol W, Chomvarin C, Sripa B, Bhudhisawasdi V, Khuntikeo N, Hahnvajanawong C, Chamsuwan A (2012) Helicobacter pylori in Thai patients with cholangiocarcinoma and its association with biliary inflammation and proliferation. HPB (Oxford) 14 (3): 177. DOI: 10.1111/J.1477-2574.2011.00423.X.

  49. Lee JH, Budanov A V., Karin M (2013) Sestrins orchestrate cellular metabolism to attenuate aging. Cell Metab. 18 (6): 792–801. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.018.

  50. Zhang J, Zhang F, Niu R (2015) Functions of Shp2 in cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 19 (9): 2075–2083. DOI: 10.1111/JCMM.12618.

  51. Poppe M, Feller SM, Römer G, Wessler S (2006) Phosphorylation of Helicobacter pylori CagA by c-Abl leads to cell motility. Oncogene 26 (24): 3462–3472. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210139.

  52. Krisch LM, Posselt G, Hammerl P, Wessler S (2016) CagA phosphorylation in Helicobacter pylori-Infected B cells is mediated by the nonreceptor tyrosine kinases of the Src and Abl families. Infect. Immun. 84 (9): 2671. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00349-16.

  53. Adiseshaiah P, Li J, Vaz M, Kalvakolanu D V, Reddy SP (2008) ERK signaling regulates tumor promoter induced c-Jun recruitment at the Fra-1 promoter. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 371 (2): 304–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.063.

  54. Pandey M (2007) Helicobacter species are associated with possible increase in risk of biliary lithiasis and benign biliary diseases. World J. Surg. Oncol. 5: 94. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-94.

  55. Peek RM, Crabtree JE (2006) Helicobacter infection and gastric neoplasia. J. Pathol. 208 (2): 233–248. DOI: 10.1002/PATH.1868.

  56. Myung SJ, Kim MH, Ki Nam Shim, Kim YS, Eun Ok Kim, Kim HJ, Park ET, Yoo KS, Lim BC, Dong Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, Young Il Min, Ji Yeon Kim (2000) Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in human biliary tree and its association with hepatolithiasis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 45 (7): 1405–1412. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005572507572.

  57. Fortinsky KJ, Bardou M, Barkun AN (2015) Role of medical therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 25 (3): 463–478. DOI: 10.1016/J.GIEC.2015.02.003.

  58. Forgacs I, Loganayagam A (2008) Overprescribing proton pump inhibitors. Br. Med. J. 336 (7634): 2. DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.39406.449456.BE.

  59. Yang YX, Metz DC (2010) Safety of proton pump inhibitor exposure. Gastroenterology 139 (4): 1115–1127. DOI: 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2010.08.023.

  60. Poulsen AH, Christensen S, McLaughlin JK, Thomsen RW, Sørensen HT, Olsen JH, Friis S (2009) Proton pump inhibitors and risk of gastric cancer: a population-based cohort study. Br. J. Cancer100 (9): 1503–1507. DOI: 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6605024.

  61. Chien LN, Huang YJ, Shao YHJ, Chang CJ, Chuang MT, Chiou HY, Yen Y (2016) Proton pump inhibitors and risk of periampullary cancers--A nested case-control study. Int. J. cancer 138 (6): 1401–1409. DOI: 10.1002/IJC.29896.

  62. Xiong J, Wang Y, Xu W, Liu Z, Wang H, Zhang Z, Han Y, Yin C, Cao S, Yang Z, Su T, Wei J, Chen G, Jin L (2020) Proton pump inhibitors and odds of cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective case-control study. Liver Int. 40 (11): 2848–2857. DOI: 10.1111/LIV.14663.

  63. Kamal H, Sadr-Azodi O, Engstrand L, Brusselaers N (2021) Association between proton pump inhibitor use and biliary tract cancer risk: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Hepatology 74 (4): 2021–2031. DOI: 10.1002/HEP.31914.

  64. Graham DY (2010) Treatment of peptic ulcers caused by Helicobacter pyloriN. Engl. J. Med. 328 (5): 349–350. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199302043280512.

  65. Redman J, Armstrong S, Ng KT (1983) Free-running activity rhythms in the rat: Entrainment by melatonin. Science 219 (4588): 1089–1091. DOI: 10.1126/science.6823571.

  66. Srinivasan V, Maestroni GJM, Cardinali DP, Esquifino AI, PandiPerumal SR, Miller SC (2005) Melatonin, immune function and aging. Immun. Ageing2: 17. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4933-2-17.

  67. Majumder R, Datta M, Pal PK, Bhattacharjee B, Chattopadhyay A, Bandyopadhyay D (2019) Protective mechanisms of melatonin on caprine spleen injury induced by cadmium (Cd): an in vitro study. Melatonin Res. (3): 57–75.  DOI: 10.32794/11250031.

  68. Magierowski M, Jasnos K, Brzozowska I, Drozdowicz D, Sliwowski Z, Nawrot E, Szczyrk U, Kwiecień S (2013) Melatonin as a therapeutic factor in gastric ulcer healing under experimental diabetes. Przegl. Lek. 70 (11): 942–946. PMID: 24697035.

  69. Celinski K, Konturek S, Slomka M, Cichoz-Lach H, Brzozowski T, Bielanski W, Konturek PC (2012) Effects of melatonin and tryptophan on healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers with Helicobacter pylori infection in humans. Gastroenterology 142 (5): S-491. PMID: 22204799.

  70. Kato K, Murai I, Asai S, Takahashi Y, Nagata T, Komuro S, Mizuno S, Iwasaki A, Ishikawa K, Arakawa Y (2002) Circadian rhythm of melatonin and prostaglandin in modulation of stress-induced gastric mucosal lesions in rats. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. Suppl. 16 (2): 29–34. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.16.s2.11.x.

  71. Majumder R, Datta M, Chattopadhyay A, Bandyopadhyay D (2021) Melatonin promotes gastric healing by modulating the components of matrix metalloproteinase signaling pathway: a novel scenario for gastric ulcer management. Melatonin Res. (2): 213–231. DOI: 10.32794/mr11250092.

  72. Brzozowska I, Strzalka M, Drozdowicz D, Konturek S, Brzozowski T (2014) Mechanisms of esophageal protection, gastroprotection and ulcer healing by melatonin. implications for the therapeutic use of melatonin in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and peptic ulcer disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 20 (30): 4807–4815. DOI: 10.2174/1381612819666131119110258.

  73. Brzozowska I, Ptak-Belowska A, Pawlik M, Pajdo R, Drozdowicz D, Konturek S, Pawlik W, Brzozowski T (2009) Mucosal strengthening activity of central and peripheral melatonin in the mechanism of gastric defense. J. Physiol. Pharmacol60 (Suppl 7): 47-56. PMID: 20388945.

  74. Han Y, DeMorrow S, Invernizzi P, Jing Q, Glaser S, Renzi A, Meng F, Venter J, Bernuzzi F, White M, Francis H, Lleo A, Marzioni M, Onori P, Alvaro D, Torzilli G, Gaudio E, Alpini G (2011) Melatonin exerts by an autocrine loop antiproliferative effects in cholangiocarcinoma; its synthesis is reduced favoring cholangiocarcinoma growth. Am. J. Physiol. - Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 301 (4): G623. DOI: 10.1152/AJPGI.00118.2011.

  75. Laothong U, Hiraku Y, Oikawa S, Intuyod K, Murata M, Pinlaor S (2015) Melatonin induces apoptosis in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines by activating the reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial pathway. Oncol. Rep. 33 (3): 1443–1449. DOI: 10.3892/OR.2015.3738.

  76. Qureshi W, Graham D (2000) Antibiotic-resistant H. pylori infection and its treatment. Curr. Pharm. Des. (15): 1537–1544. DOI: 10.2174/1381612003399077.

  77. Chojnacki C, Mędrek-Socha M, Konrad P, Chojnacki J, Błońska A (2020) The value of melatonin supplementation in postmenopausal women with Helicobacter pylori-associated dyspepsia. BMC Womens Health 20 (1): 1–6. httpsDOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-01117-z.

  78. Tekbas OF, Ogur R, Korkmaz A, Kilic A, Reiter RJ (2008) Melatonin as an antibiotic: new insights into the actions of this ubiquitous molecule. J. Pineal Res. 44 (2): 222–226. DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-079X.2007.00516.X.

  79. Rothfield L, Horecker BL (1964) The role of cell-wall lipid in the biosynthesis of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 52 (4): 939. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.52.4.939.

  80. Hebeler BH, Chatterjee AN, Young FE (1973) Regulation of the bacterial cell wall: effect of antibiotics on lipid biosynthesis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (3): 346–353. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.4.3.346.

  81. Konar V, Yilmaz Ö, Öztürk AI, Kirbaǧ S, Arslan M (2000) Antimicrobial and biological effects of bomphos and phomphos on bacterial and yeast cells. Bioorg. Chem. 28 (4): 214–225. DOI: 10.1006/BIOO.2000.1173.

  82. Limson J, Nyokong T, Daya S (1998) The interaction of melatonin and its precursors with aluminium, cadmium, copper, iron, lead, and zinc: an adsorptive voltammetric study. J. Pineal Res. 24 (1): 15–21. DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-079X.1998.TB00361.X.

  83. Tan DX, Manchester LC, Reiter RJ, Qi W, Hanes MA, Farley NJ (1999) High physiological levels of melatonin in the bile of mammals. Life Sci. 65 (23): 2523–2529. DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00519-6.

  84. Chojnacki C, Popławski T, Blasiak J, Chojnacki J, Reiter RJ, Klupinska G (2013) Expression of melatonin synthesizing enzymes in Helicobacter pylori infected gastric mucosa. Biomed Res. Int. 2013: 845032. DOI: 10.1155/2013/845032.

  85. Lai L, Yuan L, Cheng Q, Dong C, Mao L, Hill SM (2008) Alteration of the MT1 melatonin receptor gene and its expression in primary human breast tumors and breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 118 (2): 293–305. DOI: 10.1007/S10549-008-0220-1.

  86. Mortezaee K, Najafi M, Farhood B, Ahmadi A, Potes Y, Shabeeb D, Musa AE (2019) Modulation of apoptosis by melatonin for improving cancer treatment efficiency: An updated review. Life Sci. 228: 228–241.DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.05.009.

  87. Torres JDF de O, Pereira R de S (2010) Which is the best choice for gastroesophageal disorders: Melatonin or proton pump inhibitors? World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther1 (5): 102. DOI: 10.4292/WJGPT.V1.I5.102. 

CCBY.png

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License